A Sustainable Approach to Inbox Zero
My email inbox makes me anxious. I manage this anxiety and have done so for years by practising Inbox Zero... or at least a version of Inbox Zero.
My email inbox makes me anxious.
I manage this anxiety and have done so for years by practising Inbox Zero... or at least a version of Inbox Zero.
While I still firmly believe in the principles of Inbox Zero – which I will expand upon in a moment – now I think there is a better, more sustainable way to stay on top of your emails and reduce email anxiety.
The Problem with Inbox Zero
Merlin Mann came up with the concept of Inbox Zero and has always maintained that it was about devising a process for managing emails.
Unfortunately, the concept of Inbox Zero was interpreted too literally (a regular occurrence in the world of productivity). Many understood Inbox Zero to mean that you should empty your inbox daily. While I started similarly, I quickly realised approaching emails this way was flawed.
If you insist that you need to get to Inbox Zero every single day – in all of your inboxes – the sheer workload involved and the constant failure can induce anxiety.
Remember when I said that I practised Inbox Zero to reduce email anxiety? See the issue?
When you think about the volume of emails you receive, combined with the number of actual inboxes you have (email, WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, and other social media), it's no wonder we feel we are failing at Inbox Zero.
Solid Inbox Zero Concepts
Some aspects of Merlin Mann's original Inbox Zero model form the foundation of my approach. For example, I:
Have a straightforward process for managing emails.
Do not use my inbox as a task manager; emails requiring action are transferred to a task manager (my one point of truth) unless they can be dealt with in under two minutes, in which case, I ....
Apply the two-minute rule: if I can deal with an email in under two minutes, I do so immediately.
(Try to) close my email program when I am not using it – I schedule a time to deal with emails.
Furthermore, I treat my inbox as a temporary repository, so I delete and unsubscribe vigorously!
But...
Inbox Zero Weekly
If I don't empty my emails at the end of the day, that's OK.
It's OK because I have an established weekly review process that includes clearing my email inbox at the end of the week.
My weekly review process only covers my work emails and personal emails, as they are the inboxes that make me anxious. I don't worry about the others. Work emails are cleared on a Friday, and personal emails are cleared on a Sunday.
My weekly review also includes other practices to prepare for the coming week.
Make it a Ritual
I recently read an article on Ness Labs explaining the difference between routines and rituals. The author, Anne-Laure Le Cunff, explains:
“While routines can be actions that just need to be done –such as making your bed or taking a shower – rituals are viewed as more meaningful practices which have a real sense of purpose.”
My weekly review is now a ritual – a way to prepare for the week ahead. I don't just clear my emails; I reflect on the week and plan the coming week – I set intentions. It is a meaningful practice that undoubtedly contributes to both my productivity and my wellbeing.
Absolutely. Do emails in batches, not one at a time. And my cardinal rule is "decide what you need to do the first time you read the message." (I used to do the same thing you describe, reading & closing, then reading and closing again... terrible! )
I use a similar approach. I agree that this method is widely misunderstood. A particularly bad take is that every email that needs a response must be responded to that day. Instead, I explain the method as "look at every email and decide what you need to do. If you can do it then, do it. If not, mark the message to come back to. (Lots of options: add a flag or label, move to task manager, put in a folder marked "to do".)" Used this way, a major benefit of the method is that you can be sure you have not missed anything important.